When preparing to grow your dev team it is crucial to conduct a detailed codebase review. A majority of scaling organizations rush to hire more engineers when they feel pressure to deliver faster, нужна команда разработчиков but this often leads to unmanageable chaos rather than solutions. This evaluation helps you understand the actual condition of your software architecture and team methodologies before adding more people to the mix.

Initiate a code health analysis. Look for significant legacy issues such as duplicated code, lacking comments, or vulnerable packages. Use automated tools to find OWASP threats, poorly structured logic, and memory leaks. These issues may not be obvious during daily development but can cause critical outages when the team grows.

Turn your attention to system design. Is your system modular and loosely coupled or is it a monolith that no one dares to touch that no one dares to touch? A poorly designed architecture becomes exponentially harder to maintain as more developers contribute. When fixing bugs takes precedence over building new features than building new features, it is a urgent red flag your architecture needs strategic redesign.

Evaluate your release workflow. Do you have a reliable continuous integration and continuous deployment pipeline? Are unit, integration, and E2E tests covering high-risk components or is no automated coverage exists? Patchwork QA will lead to higher defect rates as the team scales.

Evaluate your onboarding resources. Are new hire guides well-maintained? Are design rationales stored in an accessible repo? Is there a comprehensive overview of how data flows between modules? Without organized information, new engineers will repeatedly ask the same questions.

Look at your tooling and environment setup. Is it straightforward to configure the local stack? Are there scripts or containers that reduce friction? If developers spend entire mornings just getting the project to run locally, you have a critical gap that will only scale exponentially with more hires.

Finally, evaluate your team’s communication and collaboration practices. Are code reviews rigorous and standardized? Are there daily standups to avoid duplication? Are there unambiguous role mapping? Growing your engineering org means managing more dependencies, and without established workflows, miscommunication will increase technical debt faster than you can fix it.

The goal isn’t to point fingers. It is about establishing long-term stability. Addressing problems proactively is dramatically less disruptive than trying to fix them when the system is already crumbling. Dedicate resources to understand your current state. Focus on high-impact fixes. And then make thoughtful hires about which roles to add. Expanding with discipline is the key to avoiding burnout.