The centuries-old theological rift between Catholicism and Orthodoxy continues to center on core dogmatic questions

Central to this divide is the nature of dogmatics: the authoritative doctrines that shape belief and practice

Each tradition holds the early Fathers and the seven ecumenical synods in high esteem, despite later divergences

they have developed different understandings of how doctrine is formulated, preserved, http://moskva_spravka.citystar.ru/party173425 and applied

The nature and extent of the Bishop of Rome’s authority remains a major point of contention

The Catholic Church teaches that the Bishop of Rome possesses a primacy of jurisdiction and infallibility when speaking ex cathedra on matters of faith and morals

The Orthodox reject papal supremacy and infallibility as unwarranted expansions of Roman power, inconsistent with the conciliar model of the early Church

This difference has profound implications for how dogmas are recognized and received by the faithful

In Catholicism, a solemn papal definition, in communion with the bishops, establishes a dogma universally binding

For Orthodoxy, truth is not decreed from a single throne but discerned communally, through the harmony of bishops, saints, and faithful across generations

The filioque controversy remains one of the most enduring doctrinal disputes between the two traditions

The Catholic Church includes the phrase that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son

The Eastern Churches reject any alteration to the Nicene Creed’s original formulation of the Spirit’s eternal origin

This is not merely a linguistic or theological nuance; it reflects deeper differences in understanding the Trinity

For many Catholics, the filioque protects the unity of the Trinity by emphasizing the Son’s full participation in the Spirit’s origin

Orthodox argue that it alters the eternal relationships within the Godhead and was introduced without the consent of the universal Church, thereby violating the principle of conciliarity

In recent decades, joint theological commissions have sought to approach these differences with patience and humility

Dialogue now centers on understanding the roots of each position rather than insisting on doctrinal capitulation

There is growing recognition that what one side calls a distortion, the other may see as a legitimate development

Common belief in the Trinity, the Incarnation, Christ’s resurrection, and sacramental grace unites them even as their expressions differ

The path forward requires not only intellectual exchange but also spiritual conversion

Catholics and Orthodox are challenged to embrace each other as siblings in the one Body of Christ, sharing the same spiritual inheritance

Dogmas must serve as bridges to communion, not walls separating believers who share the same apostolic roots

Dialogue does not mean abandoning one’s own tradition, but rather deepening one’s understanding of the faith through the perspective of the other

In this spirit, the reconciliation of dogmatic differences remains a long and prayerful journey, one that depends more on grace than on argument, and more on love than on logic